Note: This site is for reviewing legacy plan of work data from 2007-2011. If you are looking for the current plan of work interface, visit pow.nmsu.edu.
Evaluation of integrated pecan production management systems (Doņa Ana County)
Plan Goals
Dona Ana County is the largest producer of Pecans in the southwest. Labor and water issues have become an increasing burden to the pecan farmer. New management practices will be assessed to demonstrate enhanced profitability.
- Owner
- Jeff L. Anderson
- Related Plans
-
Integrated pecan production systems
Impact Reports
Western Pecan Growers Conference.
The 2008 Western Pecan Growers Conference had >300 attendees from around the western U.S. At the end of the 2008 conference, attendees were given surveys to assess the educational program. As in 2007, attendees participating in the survey were nearly unanimous, stating that conference speakers addressed topics that were immediately relevant to them and that the information conveyed will directly affect practices in their pecan orchard operations. The few complaints that arose mainly dealt with issues that the attendee had with a speaker (i.e., too scientific). Also, following the 2008 WPGA conference, the associations board evaluated the educational program which I coordinated. Nineteen (out of 21) of the board members also gave a very positive review of the conference programconfirming that the presentations provided information immediately applicable for pecan growers throughout the west. Two board members, however, were concerned that specific issues of particular areas within the western pecan region were not addressed adequately. I will attempt to address these concerns in the upcoming 2009 WPGA conference.
The 2008 Western Pecan Growers Conference had >300 attendees from around the western U.S. At the end of the 2008 conference, attendees were given surveys to assess the educational program. As in 2007, attendees participating in the survey were nearly unanimous, stating that conference speakers addressed topics that were immediately relevant to them and that the information conveyed will directly affect practices in their pecan orchard operations. The few complaints that arose mainly dealt with issues that the attendee had with a speaker (i.e., too scientific). Also, following the 2008 WPGA conference, the associations board evaluated the educational program which I coordinated. Nineteen (out of 21) of the board members also gave a very positive review of the conference programconfirming that the presentations provided information immediately applicable for pecan growers throughout the west. Two board members, however, were concerned that specific issues of particular areas within the western pecan region were not addressed adequately. I will attempt to address these concerns in the upcoming 2009 WPGA conference.
Jeff Anderson has signed on to support Evaluation of integrated pecan production management systems within Doņa Ana County.
At the end of the 2007 Western Pecan Growers Association conference, attendees were given surveys to assess the educational program. Attendees participating in the survey were nearly unanimous, stating that conference speakers addressed topics that were immediately relevant to them and that the information conveyed will directly affect practices in their pecan orchard operations. However, a few attendees at the conferences felt that too few water policy issues were addressed and that Spanish translation would be helpful.